Hale v. Worstell
Hale v. Worstell
96 N.Y.S. 1127
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
We think there was power at the Special Term to make the order appealed from, but that the discretion was not judiciously exercised in this case. No injury can occur by respecting the judgment of the Special Term and of this court pending the appeal to the Court of Appeals, and it does not appear to us as a proper case for suspending its operation. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. See 95 N. Y. Supp. 485.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.