Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

People ex rel. Cook v. Pitts

People ex rel. Cook v. Pitts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 19, 1906 · Kellogg
111 A.D. 321; 19 N.Y. Crim. 574; 97 N.Y.S. 511; 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 155

Counsel

George Addington, District Attorney, and Robert H. McCormic, Assistant District Attorney, for the appellant., Edward J. Brennan and Mark Cohn, for the respondent.

People ex rel. Cook v. Pitts

Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, J.:

This.case is governed by the rule in People ex rel. Bidwell v. Pitts (111 App. Div. 319), decided at this term of court.. The certificate uses the words “ having thereupon pleaded guilty, it is adjudged,” .etc., while the statutory.form (Code Crim. Proc. §§ 721, 722) uses the words •“ having been thereupon duly convicted upon a plea of guilty,-it is adjudged,” etc:, but it has been held this is a substantial compliance with the statutory form, as upon-a plea of guilty the only duty of the court is to sentence. (People ex rel. Evans v. McEwen, 67 How. Pr. 105, 112, 113.)

The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, the writ of habeas corpus quashed and the relator remanded to the custody of said sheriff as custodian of said penitentiary to serve the balance of his term. .

All concurred.

Order reversed, .writ of habeas corpus quashed, and relator remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Albany county, as custodian of the penitentiary, to serve balance of his term.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.