People ex rel. Morgan v. Bingham
Opinion of the Court
The relator was formerly an active member of the police force of the city of Hew York, and was retired and ,placed upon the retired list.with a pension.. Subsequently he instituted this proceeding by notice of motion to obtain a writ of mandamus requiring the defendant, as police commissioner, to reinstate him in his'former position. After the motion had been argued, but before the same had been determined, he sought to discontinue- the proceeding, but the corpo- ■ ration counsel refusing -to give hi§ consent, a motion was made for that purpose. The motion was granted and there was inserted in ' the order a provision that the proceeding was discontinued “ without prejudice to a new proceeding.” From this order the defendant appeals. .
It. is difficult to see what objection the defendant would have to the discontinuance of.the proceeding.- Certainly the relator had a
The order appealed from, therefore, is modified by striking out of "it the words “ without prejudice to a new proceeding,” and as modified the same is affirmed, without costs to either party.
Ingraham, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ., concurred.
Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, .without costs. Order filed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.