Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907

Tobin v. Alfred M. Best Co.

Tobin v. Alfred M. Best Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 21, 1907
120 A.D. 387; 105 N.Y.S. 294; 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1189

Counsel

Robert Van Iderstine, for the appellant. •, ■ George M. Curtis, for the respondent.

Tobin v. Alfred M. Best Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The complaint states a cause of action. It charges either directly or inferentially that the firm of Tobin & Tobin is. connected in business with and pursuing' the methods of one Anthony, who, according to the articles, has been notorious for years as a broker of bogus insurance; that he was once convicted for..selling “fake” policies and served a sentence in jail. The articles certainly have a tendency to injure. the business of the firm by charging that- the persons connected with it are not honest, and that the firm is doing a dishonest business. They are libelous yer se. Whatever injures the firm injures each partner, and each may maintain an action,to recover the damage caused thereby to his interest. (18 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law [2d ed.], 10.55.)

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, with leaye-to'the’ defendant'to withdraw its demurrer and inter*388pose an answer on payment of costs ■ in this court and in the court below. . •

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.