C. S. Tapley Co. v. E. L. Hasler Co.

dissent upon the ground that there is no evidence tending to show that Stephen, upon whom the summons was served, was managing agent of the defendant, or that he was ever held out or represented by the defendant to be such. Taylor v. G. S. P. Association, 136 N. Y. 343, 32 N. E. 992, 32 Am. St. Rep. 749; Coler v. Pittsburg Bridge Company, 146 N. Y. 281, 40 N. E. 779.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.