Colgate v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.
Colgate v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.
107 N.Y.S. 1123
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment (51 Misc. Rep. 503, 100 N. Y. Supp. 650) modified, so far as to permit the defendant to enforce subdivision “k” of rule 14, on the ground that -there is not sufficient evidence to show that said rule is not reasonably necessary to insure the safe management of the defendant’s trains, and, as thus modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
HOOKER, J., votes to affirm without modification.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.