Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908

People ex rel. Clancy v. Bingham

People ex rel. Clancy v. Bingham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 10, 1908
123 A.D. 226; 107 N.Y.S. 1063; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 33

Counsel

Daniel F. Cohalan, for the relator., Theodore Connoly, for the respondent.

People ex rel. Clancy v. Bingham

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The relator, a member of the police force detailed as a member of the tenement house squad, was charged with having* assaulted and insulted a young colored woman, and after a trial was convicted and dismissed from the force. It is alleged in the petition and not denied by the return that the relator was given less than forty-eight hours’ notice of trial, the notice having been servéd on him at on e-thirty-five p. m. on February twenty-sixth to appear for trial at ten a. m. on February twenty-eighth, thus giving him only forty-four and one-half hours’ notice. The rule of the department (36g) requires that notice of trial shall be served not less than forty-eight hours before the hour of trial, exclusive of Sundays," legal holidays and, half-holidays. The defendant when arraigned for trial asked for an adjournment, which was denied. The failure to give-sufficient notice was fatal to the validity of the proceedings, and the writ must be sustained, the determination of the respondent annulled and the relator reinstated,- with fifty dollars costs.

Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Lahghlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Proceedings annulled and relator reinstated, - with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.