Girbekian v. Costikyan
Opinion of the Court
The defendant appeals from an order directing the cleric to tax a hill of costs.
The default apparently remains unopened, as no order opening it appears to have been entered. The clerk’s original refusal to tax the bill of costs was right, because this is an action in which the plaintiff cannot recover costs. It is now settled beyond dispute that the liability of a stockholder for the debts of a corporation is a liability resting on contract, and hence it is one of which the Municipal Court or the City Court had jurisdiction,
The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.
Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
See Municipal Court Act (Laws of 1902, chap. 580), § 1, subd. 1, as amd. by Laws of 1905, chap. 513; Code Civ. Proc. § 315 et seq.— [Rep.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.