In re Byrne
Opinion of the Court
A convention of the Independence League to nominate a candidate for Congress from the fifteenth congressional district was duly called, to be held on the 7th of October, 1908, at No. 102
On October 9, 1908, what purported to be a certificate of this nomination, signed by the chairman and secretary, was filed with the board of elections. To this certificate objections were filed whereupon an amended or supplemental certificate duly verified was filed on October 17, 1908. Objection was made to this nomination before the board of elections and proof was taken by the commissioners. These objections were overruled, whereupon an application was made to the Special Term of the Supreme Court to reverse the decision of the board of elections on the petition of one Michael G. Byrne, as a citizen of the State of Mew York and a member of the Independence League party, which, application was denied, and from the order entered thereon the petitioner appeals.
There are two objections taken to this certificate which we deem fatal. Section 10 of the Primary Election Law (Laws of 1898, chap. 179, as amd. by Laws of 1899, chap. 173) provides that “Every convention shall be called to order by the chairman of the committee with whom the call originates, or by a person designated in writing for that purpose by such chairman, and such chairman or person so designated shall have the custody of the roll of the convention until it shall have been organ
It is undisputed in this case that this provision of the law was not complied with. " The person designated by the chairman of the county committee testifies before the board of elections of the city of Mew York that he called the convention to order about nine o’clock, but adjourned the meeting" until the following night because there were not enough delegates present to compose a quorum; that on the following night the convention reassembled and the person designated by the chairman of the county committee of the Independence League called the roll; that after the calling of the roll from which he testified he ascertained that there was a quorum present a""'temporary chairman .was elected by acclamation, and there was no other roll called after the formal calling of the roll to ascertain whether there was a quorum present. The person elected as chairman of the convention testified that Mr. Sinnott called the convention to order; that the temporary chairman was elected by acclamation, that he took the chair and a temporary secretary was elected in the same way.
The careful provisions of the statute providing for the temporary "organization of the convention require the person authorized to call "the convention to order to call the roll for the election of a temporary chairman. This provision initiates the meeting of the convention, and until this provision of the statute is complied with the organization of the convention is not completé and the convention is not in a position to transact business or make a valid nomination. To organize the convention the duties of a temporary chairman are required, and the statute provides how the temporary chairman shall be elected. It must be upon a call of the roll of the convention, “ and as the name of each delegate is called he shall rise in his place and declare his choice for such officer.” The roll -of the convention is provided for by subdivision 4 of section 8 of the act.(as amd. supra). That subdivision provides that “The
The other objection relates to the oath required to be taken by the temporary chairman. Section 10 of the Primary Election Law (as amd. supra) provides that “ Before entering upon their duties, the temporary and permanent chairman of every convention, and the chairman and members of any committee on contested seats therein, shall respectively take an oath to faithfully perform the duties of their offices, which oath may be taken before any officer authorized by law to administer an oath, and shall form a part of, and be filed with, the records of the convention.” ■ This provision seems to require that before either the temporary or permanent chairman of the convention shall perform any of the functions of the office to which they have been elected they should take the oath prescribed, and this oath must be taken before an officer authorized by law to administer an oath, and shall
As we think this certificate should have. been rejected by the board of elections upon these two grounds, it is not necessary to consider the other objections to the certificate taken by the appellant.
It follows that the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and the application granted..
Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and application granted.
See Laws'of 1896, chap. 909, § 66, as amd. by Laws of 1905, chap. 643,— [Rep,
See footnote on p. 333.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.