Rich v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Rich v. Pennsylvania Railroad
128 A.D. 909
Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that the case should have been submitted to the jury. See same case reported in 112 Appellate Division, 818. All concurred, except Kruse J., who dissented.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.