Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908

Woolsey v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 2, 1908 · Gaynor

129 A.D. 410; 113 N.Y.S. 245; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1312

Counsel

Francis R. Stoddard, Jr. [George D. Yeomans with him on the brief], for the appellant., Adolph Ruger, for the respondent.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Ligouri v. American Railway Traffic Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1909)
Liguori v. American Railway Traffic Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1909)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J.:

A judgment for the plaintiff being reversed, she then moved for leave to amend her complaint by a new allegation of negligence, as the ground of reversal was such that recovery could not be had on the original allegation of negligence. The motion was granted on payment of $30. The terms should" have been payment of all costs after service of the answer (McEntyre v. Tucker, 40 App. Div. 444; Rosenberg v. Feiering, 124 id. 522).

The order must be modified accordingly.

Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order modified in accordance with opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.