Clinton v. Munson Steamship Line
Clinton v. Munson Steamship Line
129 A.D. 895; 113 N.Y.S. 1129
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and orders reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for error of the court in refusing to charge the defendant’s request that if defendant furnished a proper and sufficient cover for the hole and it was taken and left off the hole by the neglect of the coemployees of the plaintiff, the defendant was entitled to a verdict. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.