Stelzenmuller v. See Saw Pleasure Railway Co.
Stelzenmuller v. See Saw Pleasure Railway Co.
129 A.D. 926; 114 N.Y.S. 1148
Opinion of the Court
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the question whether the plaintiff had broken the contract and thereby justified his discharge should have been submitted to the jury. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.