Schimkevitz v. Bingham

I concur in the reversal'of the injunction order in this case upon the grounds stated in my concurring memorandum in Eden Musee American Company, Limited, v. Theodore A. Bingham, Police Com’r, et al. (argued and decided herewith) 110 N. Y. Supp. 210, which apply to the facts here presented.

The question presented on this appeal is the same as that presented in the case of Shepard v. Bingham (decided here*220with) 110 N. Y. Supp. 217, and for the reasons there stated the order appealed from is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with $10 costs.