Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908

O. J. Gude Co. v. Murphy

O. J. Gude Co. v. Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 18, 1908 · Scott
113 N.Y.S. 860 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Julius M. Mayer, for appellant., C. L. Barber, for respondent.

O. J. Gude Co. v. Murphy

Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J.

For the reasons stated in People ex rel. M. Wineburgh Advertising Company v. Edward S. Murphy, as Superintendent of Buildings (decided herewith) 113 N. Y. Supp. 855, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the motion for a peremptory mandamus granted. Settle order on notice.

PATTERSON, P. J., and INGRAHAM, J., concur. LAUGHLIN, J., concurs, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising Co., 124 App. Div. 641, 109 N. Y. Supp. 335. CLARKE, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.