Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908

Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Insurance

Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 30, 1908 · Miller
114 N.Y.S. 139 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frederick B. Campbell (Charles M. Tur ell, on the brief), for appellant., Royall Victor, for respondent.

Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Insurance

Opinion of the Court

MILLER, J.

Section 545 of the Code of Civil Procedure authorizes the striking out of “irrelevant, redundant, or scandalous matter; contained in a pleading.” That section does not authorize the striking out of an entire cause of action or defense, but only of irrelevant, redundant, or scandalous matter contained therein. The sufficiency of the matter pleaded as a defense cannot thus be tested. An entire defense, though insufficient, cannot be stricken out as irrelevant. Hanson v. Collier, 119 App. Div. 794, 104 N. Y. Supp. 787; Cardeza v. Osborn, 33 Mise. Rep. 46, 65 N. Y. Supp. 450, affirmed 54 App. Div. 636, 66 N. Y. Supp. 1138; Stroock Plush Co. v. Talcott (Sup.) 113 N. Y. Supp. 314.

It is conceded that the defendant offered no objection to the striking out of the eighth paragraph, but the appeal is taken from the entire order. It should, therefore, be modified, so as to provide that only the eighth paragraph of the answer be stricken out, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with costs of this appeal. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.