Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /New York /Cases /Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York /

1908

1848 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York opinions from 1908.

  • In re Leonard Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 493; 111 N.Y.S. 905; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4040
  • In re Mayor of New York Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 650; 111 N.Y.S. 895; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4072
  • In re Rockmore Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 499; 111 N.Y.S. 879; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4041
  • In re the Removal of Deuel from the Office of Justice of the Court of Special Sessions Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 640; 111 N.Y.S. 969; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4069
  • Jones v. Ramsey Jul 8, 1908 No. 1 127 A.D. 704; 111 N.Y.S. 993; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4082
  • Krauss v. Krauss Jul 8, 1908 No. 1 127 A.D. 740; 111 N.Y.S. 788; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4090
  • Krauss v. Krauss Jul 8, 1908 No. 2 127 A.D. 743; 111 N.Y.S. 790; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4091
  • Lantry v. Mede Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 557; 111 N.Y.S. 833; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4056
  • Leavitt v. de Vries Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 721; 111 N.Y.S. 998; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4084
  • Lobasco v. Moxie Nerve Food Co. Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 677; 111 N.Y.S. 1007; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4077
  • McCormick v. Shannon Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 745; 111 N.Y.S. 875; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4092
  • Moir v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Society Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 591; 112 N.Y.S. 57; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4062
  • Morette v. Bostwick Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 701; 111 N.Y.S. 1021; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4081
  • Murphy v. Ottmann Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 563; 111 N.Y.S. 912; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4057
  • Napier v. Spielmann Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 567; 111 N.Y.S. 983; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4058
  • Napier v. Spielmann Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 711; 111 N.Y.S. 1009; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4083
  • National Park Bank v. Saitta Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 624; 111 N.Y.S. 927; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4066
  • New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Marshall Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 534; 112 N.Y.S. 33; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048
  • Pearlman v. Metropolitan Surety Co. Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 539; 111 N.Y.S. 882; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4049
  • People v. Henry Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 489; 22 N.Y. Crim. 537; 111 N.Y.S. 1005; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4038
  • People v. Luhrs Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 634; 22 N.Y. Crim. 550; 111 N.Y.S. 749; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4068
  • People v. Schlessel Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 510; 22 N.Y. Crim. 543; 112 N.Y.S. 45; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4043
  • Russell v. Herrick Jul 8, 1908 The sole, question presented by the appeal is whether Horton wa,s, in fact* a member of the partnership at; the time the notes were given, and its solution depends upon the construction of a written agreement which was entered into on the 31st of January, 1898, between Edmund R. Herrick and E. R. Herrick & Co., parties of the first part, and the appellant Horton, party of the second part. The agreement recites that the firm of E. R. Herrick & Co. had become indebted for loans and advances to various individuals in the aggregate sum of $19,986.82, which indebtedness had been acquired by the party of the second part, who, in consideration of provisions of the agreement for the payment of said sum, promised to loan the firm a further sum of $24,000, such loan, as well as the original indebtedness, to be evidenced by notes made by the firm, payable to him on demand, bearing interest at the rate of six per cent per annum, payable semi-annually on the thirty-first day of December and the thirtieth day of June in each and every year, and which notes were to be indorsed by Edmund R. Herrick; that Herrick should take charge of the business of the firm, devoting his entire time thereto; keep true books of account; promptly deposit all moneys received in- a bank named to the credit of the firm, and pay all its debts by checks drawn to the order of the creditors; not contract any obligations exceeding $500 without obtaining Horton’s consent; would not indorse any paper either in his name or in the name of the firm, or engage in any business similar to that conducted by the firm during the life of the agreement; that the books and records of the firm were at all times to be open for the inspection of Horton, who was to have a trial balance once every month, and .that the books were to be balanced and an account struck at least twice each year for the purpose of- ascertaining the profits or losses of the business during the preceding six months; that Herrick was to have a salary of $1,800 per year, and in addition thereto the right to draw a sum not exceeding $50 per month as against his share of the future profits of the firm, provided that the parties to the agreement agreed that the business warranted it; that at the end of each year an annual account should be taken of the receipts and disbursements of the firm for the preceding year, and if there were any surplus of receipts over- expenses, after paying the interest upon the notes held by Horton, then he was to receive a sum equal to one-half of such surplus, and after his notes had been paid, together with the interest thereon, he was to be paid only ten per cent of such surplus for a period of ten years, if he lived so long, and if not, until his death. The agreement further provided that Horton was not a partner, and that no representation should be made to that effect, and that his relation to the firm was solely that of a lender for use in its business; and that the profits which he was to receive were only for the purpose of compensating him, not by way of interest, but for his risk of loss 127 A.D. 503; 111 N.Y.S. 974; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042
  • Sariol v. James P. McDonald Co. Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 648; 111 N.Y.S. 796; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4071
  • Sheilds v. Paul B. Pugh & Co. Jul 8, 1908 111 N.Y.S. 1144
  • Smythe v. Cleary Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 555; 111 N.Y.S. 872; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4055
  • Sodekson v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 553; 111 N.Y.S. 877; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4054
  • Stewart v. Stewart Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 672; 111 N.Y.S. 736; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4075
  • Stewart v. Stewart Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 724; 111 N.Y.S. 734; 20 N.Y. Ann. Cas. 290; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4085
  • Trust Co. of America v. Hamilton Bank Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 515; 112 N.Y.S. 84; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4044
  • Tully v. New York City Railway Co. Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 688; 111 N.Y.S. 919; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4079
  • Velleman v. Rohrig Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 692; 111 N.Y.S. 736; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4080
  • Wilber v. Gillespie Jul 8, 1908 127 A.D. 604; 112 N.Y.S. 20; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4063
  • Bradshaw v. Mutual Life Insurance Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 817; 112 N.Y.S. 107; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4104
  • Browne v. Pratt & Letchworth Co. Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 859; 111 N.Y.S. 863; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4116
  • Conkling v. Krandusky Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 761; 112 N.Y.S. 13; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4096
  • Dangelo v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 835; 111 N.Y.S. 800; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4110
  • Ely v. Perkins Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 823; 112 N.Y.S. 122; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4105
  • Gail v. Gail Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 892; 112 N.Y.S. 96; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123
  • Gordon v. Village of Silver Creek Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 888; 112 N.Y.S. 54; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4122
  • Greco v. Pratt Chuck Co. Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 798; 111 N.Y.S. 1000; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4099
  • Haley v. Solvay Process Co. Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 753; 112 N.Y.S. 25; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4094
  • Hamilton v. Hamilton Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 871; 112 N.Y.S. 10; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4118
  • Harrison v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 804; 111 N.Y.S. 812; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4100
  • Hornell & Dansville Railroad v. Trustees of the Inc. Village of Dansville Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 867; 111 N.Y.S. 845; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4117
  • In re Gilfillan Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 846; 111 N.Y.S. 808; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4113
  • Kurt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 838; 111 N.Y.S. 859; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4111
  • Laplaca v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 843; 111 N.Y.S. 797; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4112
  • McDougall v. White Jul 7, 1908 111 N.Y.S. 1130
  • Moore v. Coughlin Jul 7, 1908 127 A.D. 810; 111 N.Y.S. 856; 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4102
« Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 37 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑