Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Rosenthal v. Barnett

Rosenthal v. Barnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 1909
131 A.D. 928; 116 N.Y.S. 239
Rosenthal v. Barnett

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We think that the complaint states the cause of action with sufficient particularity, and that there is nothing in the papers to show that a bill of particulars is necessary to protect the rights of the defendant. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.