Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

Lageza v. Chelsea Fibre Mills

Lageza v. Chelsea Fibre Mills
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 10, 1909 · Jenks
135 A.D. 731; 119 N.Y.S. 906; 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4048

Counsel

Eugene 11. Hawkins \\Bertrand L. Pettigrew with him on the brief], for the appellant., Harry 8. Austin, for the respondent.

Lageza v. Chelsea Fibre Mills

Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

This action for personal injuries through negligence was brought in the county of Queens. The defendant duly demanded that the place of trial be changed to the county of Hew York. As it appeared that the plaintiff had never been a resident of the county of Queens, but was a resident of the county of Kings when he began *732■his action, and that the defendant was a resident of New York county, the defendant was entitled to the change of venue as a matter of right. (Code Civ. Proc. § 984; Nichols N. Y. Pr. p. 1930, and authorities cited.) This absolute right could not be defeated .by a showing as to the convenience of witnesses» (Veeder v. Baker, 83 N. Y. 156; Mills & Gibb v. Starin, 119 App. Div. 336) After the change has been made, the jilaintiif may then avail himself of either of the 2d and 8d subdivisions of section 987 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Authorities supra.)

The order must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion must he granted, with costs.

Burr, Thomas, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and. disbursements,' and motion granted, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.