Disken v. Toplitz
Disken v. Toplitz
135 A.D. 909; 119 N.Y.S. 1123
Opinion of the Court
The judgment appealed from should be modified by deducting from the recovery of the plaintiffs $165 allowed for replastering on account of leakage, and also by deducting the interest allowed on plaintiffs’ recovery. As so modified the judgment should be affirmed, without costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.