Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

In re De Groot

In re De Groot
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1909
136 A.D. 899
In re De Groot

Opinion of the Court

Order of the Special Term modified in the following particulars: Ballot Exhibit Mo. 20 is a void ballot and should not have been counted for James McLaughlin. Ballot Exhibit Mo. 36 is a void ballot and should not have been counted for William A. De Groot. Ballot Exhibit, Mo. 29 *900is a void ballot and should not have been counted for James F. McLaughlin. Ballot Exhibit No. 42is a void ballot and should not have been counted for James F. McLaughlin. The order, in so far as it is appealed from, as so modified,should be affirmed, without costs to either party, and. a recount had in accordance with this decision. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Burr, Thomas and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.