Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909

In re De Groot

In re De Groot
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 30, 1909
120 N.Y.S. 1121 (New York Supplement)
In re De Groot

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Order of the Special Term modified in the following particulars: Ballot Exhibit No. 20 is a void ballot, and should not have been counted for James McLaughlin. Ballot Exhibit No. 36 is a void ballot, and should not have been counted for William A. De Groot. Ballot Exhibit No. 29 is a void ballot, and should not have been counted for James F. McLaughlin. Ballot Exhibit No. 42 is a void ballot, and should not have been counted for James F. McLaughlin. The order, in so far as it is appealed from, as so modified, should be affirmed, without costs to either party, and a recount had in accordance with this decision. See, also, 119 N. Y. Supp. 1123.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.