People ex rel. Beverforden v. Bauer
Opinion of the Court
The relator was a candidate for the office of town superintendent of highways at the town election held on November 2, 1909. During the canvass by the town board of canvassers provided by statute (Town Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 62; Laws of 1909, chap. 63], § 582) he procured an order to show cause why the canvassers should not exclude the votes cast in .certain election districts of the town, situated within the limits of incorporated villages, and a stay in the meantime. His motion was heard and decided against him and an order was entered accordingly on November 30, 19,09. From this order he appealed to this court on December 4, 1909. He did not bring on the argument of the appeal until March 14, 1910. It appears that after the denial of his motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus the canvassers convened and completed
The appeal should be dismissed, with- ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks,' Burr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.