Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Pettis v. Schwartz

Pettis v. Schwartz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 11, 1910
137 A.D. 242; 122 N.Y.S. 50; 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 646

Counsel

Frank Walling {Harvey J. Cohen with him on the brief], for the appellant., A. Joseph Ceist {Henry Swartz with him on the brief], for the respondent.

Pettis v. Schwartz

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The questions presented by this appeal are the same as those presented in the case of Adams v. Schwartz (137 App. Div. 230), argued and decided herewith. The plaintiff in- this action was also a bill-poster, and claims to have been arrested and maliciously prosecuted at the same time and place and under like circumstances, and the defendant likewise counterclaimed against him for trespass..

On the authority of the opinion in the other action the interlocutory judgment should be reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, but with leave to defendant to serve an amended answer, omitting the counterclaim, on payment of the costs -of the appeal and of the demurrer.

Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Claree, Scott and Miller, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend on payment of costs. ■

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.