Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Hawes v. Wells

Hawes v. Wells
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1910
137 A.D. 906; 122 N.Y.S. 252
Hawes v. Wells

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We recently held that this complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute-a cause of action. (See Hawes v. Dunlop, No, 1, 136 App. Div. 629.) Any answer is good enough for a bad complaint. Therefore this answer was good enough. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars Costs. Present — Clarke, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, with tén dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.