Ford v. Chase
Ford v. Chase
137 A.D. 927
Opinion of the Court
Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the indebtedness in question was contracted prior to the time when the defendants became stockholders of the corporation, withiq the meaning of section 56 of the Stock Corporation Law.
See Gen. Laws, chap. 36 (Laws of 1892, chap. 688), § 54, as amd. by Laws of 1901, chap. 354; revised into Consol. Laws, chap. 59 (Laws of 1909, chap. 61), §56.—[Rep.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.