Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Bluthenthal & Bickart, Inc. v. Crowley

Bluthenthal & Bickart, Inc. v. Crowley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 3, 1910 · Miller
138 A.D. 845; 123 N.Y.S. 520; 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1644

Counsel

John G. Snyder, for the appellant., Frederick M. Gzaki, for the respondent.

Bluthenthal & Bickart, Inc. v. Crowley

Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

The plaintiff is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. It moved to vacate the order for its examination before trial and seeks to sustain the order appealed from on the sole ground that it is a foreign corporation. We have been unable to find any provision of the Code of Civil Procedure, and none has been called to our attention, which grants a foreign corporation, suing in the courts of this State, immunity from examination before trial, and we know of no reason why sections 870 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure are not as applicable to the case of a non-resident party as to that of a resident.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs.

Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed,' with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.