People v. Wiggins
People v. Wiggins
138 A.D. 917; 123 N.Y.S. 1135
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence does not show that the defendant was the owner of the milk, or furnished or delivered the same to the factory,, within the meaning of the statute,
See Agricultural Law (Gen. Laws, chap. 33; Laws of 1893, chap. 338), § 20; Id. § 22, as amd. by Laws of 1907, chap. 241; Id. § 12, as amd. by Laws of 1898e chap. 557.— [Rep.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.