Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500). Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500).