Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Hayes v. Hayes

Hayes v. Hayes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1910 · Jkxks
141 A.D. 35; 125 N.Y.S. 652; 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3799

Counsel

John F. Harrington, for the appellant., Ely Rosenberg, for the respondent.

Hayes v. Hayes

Opinion of the Court

Jkxks, J.:

The action is for divorce. The plaintiff moved for a counsel fee ' to - prosecute .an appeal taken, from an. order denying -the motion, for am adjournment,- «“ upon which a, judgment, of.. dismissal .wag, rendered against ” her, and for alimony during .the said appeal,. , The - ■ Special. Term made...an,.order, that allows a counsel fee,.and .the defendant appeals.,, But tlie order of which the. plaintiff complains' hut, .denies, her .ipo,tioR,,:made¡ at.. Special Term for an,-adjournment. S.u.ch an order.’is, not appealable. (Nichols, N. Y. Pr. 3634 and references.) •,It may,he. that the. plaintiff. has,, a, grievance,,.but .she '• has- mistaken .the practice,, and is not entitled., to, .an allowance ..to enable.her ito:purs.n.e.her erroneous course. ■ , ..

The order must be reversed, and the. motion, must be denied. ,

Hirsohbeeg, P. J.j Woodward, Burr and Thomas, JJ., concurred,

Order reversed and motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.