Reuter v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
Opinion of the Court
The negligence charged against the defendant is that it did not . afford to plaintiff as a passenger a reasonable opportunity to leave its car. . It appears that plaintiff with his family purposed to alight at or near a station in order to board a connecting train. The version of the plaintiff is that the car stopped, and, when he was attempting to alight from the running board, the car started up so that he was thrown off onto the ground. The witnesses for plaintiff as to the accident consisted of himself and his daughter. But the testimony of the latter is not clear in favor of the plaintiff. On her direct examination she testifies that the car stopped, and
The judgment should, therefore, be reversed.. and a new, trial should- be ordered, costs to abide the event. . 7 ■
Woodward and Garb, JJ.,. concurred; Thomas and -Rich, JJ., dissented. . ■
. Judgment and order "of the Municipal ■ Court reversed and new. trial ordered, costs to abide the-event. •
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.