Ribner v. Kleinberg

Action upon a demand note against the maker. The defendant proved that he was induced to sign the note because it was represented to him that it was a receipt. This evidence was not denied. The defendant also proved that the note was without consideration. It follows that the verdict of' the jury in favor of the plaintiff cannot be sustained.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.