Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910

Slade v. Bennett

Slade v. Bennett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 22, 1910
122 N.Y.S. 1146 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles L Craig, for appellants., Joseph M. Hartfield, for respondent.

Slade v. Bennett

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order should be modified, by providing that paragraphs 1 to 21, both inclusive, paragraphs 24 to 31, both inclusive, and paragraphs 34 to 51, both inclusive, of the supplemental complaint, be stricken out as irrelevant ; and the order should be further modified, so as to provide that the plaintiffs may serve upon the defendant a supplemental complaint, containing paragraphs 22, 23, 32, 33, 52, and 53 of the amended complaint heretofore served, within five days from service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry upon the attorneys for the plaintiffs. As so modified, the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.