Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911

Wilson v. Nevins

Wilson v. Nevins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 15, 1911 · Ingraham
142 A.D. 932; 127 N.Y.S. 1150
Wilson v. Nevins

Dissenting Opinion

Ingraham, P. J. (dissenting):

I dissent upon the ground that there is no evidence to justify a finding that the defendant had constituted his wife as his agent to make the purchases in question. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The judgment should be modified upon respondent’s stipulation by deducting §553.30 from the amount recovered, and as modified the judgment and the order appealed from should be affirmed,- without costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J. (dissenting), McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.