Goldstein v. Kaminsky
Goldstein v. Kaminsky
126 N.Y.S. 1130
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
This action was brought fori conversion of a trunk and personal wearing apj' parel, etc, belonging to plaintiff. On close of. plaintiff’s evidence the complaint was dismissed. The testimony offered by plaintiff was sufficient to prove a prima facie case, and the complaint should not have been dismissed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.