Kremer v. Haas

This case was before this court on a former appeal (123 N. Y. Supp. 975), and a judgment for the defendant was reversed for the reason that the defense of pay- \ ment was not sufficiently proved. There is no '} material difference in the testimony introduced upon this trial, and the judgment must therefore be reversed, and judgment ordered for the , plaintiff for the amount demanded in the com-l plaint, with costs in this court and in the court ( below.