Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Katz v. Lott

Katz v. Lott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 15, 1912
148 A.D. 911; 133 N.Y.S. 1128
Katz v. Lott

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We think that there was a question of fact for the jury and that upon the evidence the learned trial judge was not justified in directing a verdict for the defendant. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Miller and Dowling, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.