Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Oppenheimer v. City of New York

Oppenheimer v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 16, 1912 · Clarke
149 A.D. 175; 133 N.Y.S. 743; 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6364

Counsel

Frederick Hulse of counsel [Eidlitz & Hulse, attorneys], for the appellant., Robert R. Reed of counsel [Caldwell, Masslich & Reed, attorneys], for the respondent Security Bank.

Oppenheimer v. City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

This is a similar motion to that presented in Oppenheimer v. City of New York (Chelsea Bank) (149 App. Div. 172), handed down herewith, the Security Bank having procured an order for its introduction as defendant, basing its application upon an assignment of forty thousand dollars out of the retained percentages, and for the reasons set forth in the preceding case the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.