Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Caldwell v. Baker

Caldwell v. Baker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1912
151 A.D. 883; 135 N.Y.S. 1103
Caldwell v. Baker

Opinion of the Court

We think that section 1001 of the Code of Civil Procedure contemplates a hearing upon a case and exceptions, settled and signed by the judge or by the *884referee. (Green v. Roworth, 4 Misc. Rep. 141; Raynor v. Raynor, 94 N. Y. 251; 3 Nichols N. Y. Pr. 2726; 2 Rumsey Pr. 510.) The case presented must be printed (Rule 43),* and we see no special reason for a-dispensation in this instance. ' As the purpose of the procedure prescribed by the said section is said to be facilitation of the proceedings, and possibly the saving of the expenses of a reference, in that this court might upset the interlocutory decree (Nichols, supra; Church v. Kidd, 3 Hun, 263), the court .will upon a proper showing stay the proceedings before a referee. But the motion papers presented do not justify such an order in this case. Motion denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.

General Rules of Practice, rule 43.— [Rep.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.