Whitman v. Morris
Opinion of the Court
The defendants were, by order, directed to make the third defense or counterclaim more definite and certain. In pursuance of the order they served an amended answer. Plaintiff then moved to strike out the third defense or counterclaim.
So far as can be ascertained from the record before us the answer served substantially complied with the order and, if it did not, the plaintiff’s attorneys having accepted the costs and retained it for two days, could not thereafter return it. The proper practice, under such circumstances, was to retain the answer and then move to strike out the portion which did not comply with the order. (Robertson. v. Rockland Cemetery Imp. Co., 54 App. Div. 191; Lange v. Hirsch, 38 id. 116.)
The order appealed from is reversed;, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Miller and Dowling, JJ.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.