Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1912
153 A.D. 938; 138 N.Y.S. 1111
City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Judgment, so far as appealed from, affirmed; with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constitutes a bridge within the meaning of the statute.*

See Railroad Law (Gen. Laws, chap. 39; Laws of 1890, chap. 565), § 64, added by Laws of 1897, chap. 754, as amd. by Laws of 1902, chap. 140; since amd. by Laws of 1909, chap. 153; now Railroad Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 49; Laws of 1910, chap. 481), §93.— [Rep.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.