Ketcham v. Stewart

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the defendants, having objected to the evidence as to the cost of repairs and having obtained a ruling in their own favor, cannot be heard to insist upon a reversal because the like evidence when offered by them was excluded. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the *941evidence of the reasonable cost of repairs to the boat was improperly excluded.