Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912

Eddy Glickman Building, Concreting & Improvement Co. v. Gainsborough Construction Co.

Eddy Glickman Building, Concreting & Improvement Co. v. Gainsborough Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 6, 1912
138 N.Y.S. 1114 (New York Supplement)
Eddy Glickman Building, Concreting & Improvement Co. v. Gainsborough Construction Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the County Court of Kings County reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the final' award of *1115costs, upon questions of fact as well as of law. There is evidence from which the court might find that some work was done under the original contract as late as the 15th of December, 1909, and therefore the fourth finding of fact is erroneous. The eleventh finding of fact, although more strictly a conclusion of law, is erroneous, in that it finds that the notice of lien does not state the business address nor the principal place of business of the lienor.

HIRSCHBERG, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.