People ex rel. Robinson v. O'Connell
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from an order of the Special Term directing that a writ of mandamus issue to the appellant O’Connell, as the clerk of the town of North Hempstead, requiring him to receive and file the certificate of nomination of the candidates of the National Progressive party for town officers and the office of school director in said town, to be voted for at an election to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in April next. The certificate of nomination was prepared in conformity to the rules of the Nassau county committee of said National Progressive party. The question presented upon this appeal relates to the method and procedure the members of that party shall adopt in nominating their candidates for town offices.
The party was organized in June, 1912, and participated in the November election of that year, its candidates for State offices receiving more than 350,000 votes. It is a party and not an independent organization (Election Law [Consol. Laws, chap. 17; Laws of 1909, chap. 22], § 3, subd. 8, as renum. from § 2 and amd. by Laws of 1911, chap. 891), and the provisions' of the Election Law applicable to the nomination of
But two methods of nomination are provided by the Election Law; one is by independent bodies, the other by parties. The latter nominate under the provisions of section 45 of the Election Law (as added by Laws of 1911, chap. 891), and subdivision 4 of that section is as follows: “All other ntiminations and elections by a political party, both for party nominations and party positions, shall be made at the primary election herein provided for except that party nominations for town, ward and village officers and for the office of school director shall be made in the manner prescribed by rules to be adopted by the party committee of the county wherein such town, village or school district is located, and of the city committee wherein such ward is located.” The Nassau county committee have adopted rules providing the procedure for selecting its candidates for town offices and the office of school director, which provide in substance for unofficial primaries at which delegates are elected to conventions which nominate party candidates in the towns. These rules furnish authority for making the . nominations; unless it is to be held that the word “ committee ” as used in said subdivision 4 must be a committee elected at a primary election. Such a construction would make it impossible for the National Progressive party to nominate candidates for town, ward and village offices, a construction which the Legislature never intended. It would render the statute unconstitutional (Matter of Hopper v. Britt, 203 N. Y. 144), a construction which it is the duty of the court
I believe that subdivision 14 of section 3 of the Election Law (as renum. from. § 2 and amd. by Laws of 1911, chap. 891) applies only to parties which have participated in the party primaries, or have had an opportunity to do so; that it has no application to the facts presented by the record before us, and that the National Progressive party may lawfully nominate and choose its candidates for town offices and school director in the town of North Hempstead in the manner prescribed by its rules for Nassau county, and that it is the duty of the town clerk to receive and file the certificate of such nomination. It is likewise his duty to print an official ballot, and in the party ticket or column of the National Progressive party the names of the candidates so nominated.
The order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Jenks, P. J., Hirschberg, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.