Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Perlman v. I. Blyn & Sons

Perlman v. I. Blyn & Sons
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 15, 1913
155 A.D. 888; 139 N.Y.S. 1082
Perlman v. I. Blyn & Sons

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the counsel for the plaintiff asked a witness on the stand: “ Are you connected with this insurance company that is in this case?” That question having been asked, counsel for the defendant moved to withdraw a j uror and to have a mistrial declared, on the ground that it was sought to prejudice the rights of the defendant to a fair and impartial *889trial. (See Akin v. Lee, 206 N. Y. 20.) Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order-reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.