Whitmore v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Without passing upon the merits of the controversy, in view of the defendant’s statement that it does not intend to cut off the water for failure to pay the higher rates until its right to do so is determined, it seems best to continue the temporary injunction until the trial of the action. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.