New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Mills
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re the Chittenango-Cazenovia, Part 1, Highway (New York County Courts 1927)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Without any expression or intimation of opinion upon the merits of the controversy, we affirm the exercise of discretion by the Special Term in sending back the report to the commissioners by affirmance of the order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Board of Water Commissioners, 55 App. Div. 77; Matter of Prospect Park & C. I. R. R. Co., 85 N. Y. 489.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.