Mulcahy v. Purcell
Mulcahy v. Purcell
157 A.D. 939; 142 N.Y.S. 1131
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the communication to the jury of the information that there was an insurance company behind the defendants was improper and prejudicial. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.