U. S. Leasing & Holding Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ball v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co. (N.Y. 1920)
- Ball v. New York Central Railroad (N.Y. 1920)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff neither alleged nor proved that the railroad was operated negligently or unreasonably. There is no finding of negligent or unreasonable use. The case is almost identical with Friedman v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R. Co. (89 App. Div. 38; affd., 180 N. Y. 550). (See, also, McCarty v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 189 N. Y. 40.) The judgment should be reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with cost 3. Order to be settled on notice.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.