Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Eckert v. Truman

Eckert v. Truman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 15, 1913
158 A.D. 939; 143 N.Y.S. 1115
Eckert v. Truman

Opinion of the Court

After entry of judgment the judgment debtor may appeal by another attorney without any substitution. (Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 656; Cruikshank v. Goodwin, 20 N. Y. Supp. 757; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695.) Mr. White’s authority to represent Mrs. Truman in these proceedings had since the judgment, stands undisputed by Mr. Davenport, the former attorney of record. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal and to set aside the other proceedings taken in behalf of the appellant is denied, but without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.